今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓,題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿:
It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:
//The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.
Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…
In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.
Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.
Thank you very much!//
Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!
Roger Chung, PhD
Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過3萬的網紅Eric's English Lounge,也在其Youtube影片中提到,期待的政治英文影片第二集出爐了!!! 今天探討的是三位政治大咖的英文口語。再次聲明,此影片的目的不在於比較英文能力,而是提供學習者英文口語的實際操作和可以注意的小細節。對我而言,英文是一種工具,我並不覺得台灣的政治人物一定需要擁有驚人的外語能力。以下是影片中提到的一些資訊,請看完再發表評論: ...
in the first instance中文 在 EZ Talk Facebook 的精選貼文
#EZTALK #你不知道的美國大小事 #ratVSmouse
🇺🇸 Idioms 美國生活用語:老鼠 rat╱mouse 🐁
說到美國老鼠,你會想到可愛的米老鼠,還是《料理鼠王》裡頭的老鼠?趁鼠年第一天,來介紹老美眼中的老鼠!
💪順便搞懂 rat 跟 mouse 的不同之處吧!
1⃣ rat
2⃣ rat out/on
3⃣ smell a rat
4⃣ the rat race
5⃣ quiet at a mouse
6⃣ poor as a church mouse
--
As we enter the Year of the Rat, it’s a good time to think about rodents and their cultural significance. The first animal in the Chinese Zodiac, rats are associated with intelligence, diligence and ambition. And people born in the Year of the Rat can look forward to being wealthy and successful.
鼠年即將到來,正好來介紹一下鼠類跟其文化意涵。身為十二生肖排名第一,老鼠通常會讓我們想到聰明、勤勞且有野心。鼠年出生的人可望成功富有。
In America, however, rats don’t have such a positive image. They are seen as dirty pests that steal food and spread disease. It’s therefore no accident the rat-related idioms are all negative. 1⃣ First, the term “rat” itself. In colloquial American English, a rat is a deceptive, disloyal person or an informant. Ex: Don’t trust Tommy—he’s a rat!
不過在美國,老鼠可就沒有這麼正面的形象。牠們被視為髒東西,愛偷食物並且散播疾病,所以沒有意外地,跟老鼠有關的美國用語都是負面的。首先來看看 rat 這個字,在美式口語英文中,講某人是 rat,就是說他是「騙子、不忠實」,或是「告密者」。如:Don’t trust Tommy—he’s a rat!(別相信湯米,他是個騙子!)
2⃣ “Rat” can also be used in the verb phrase “rat out/on,” which means “to inform on sb.” Ex: The thief ratted out his accomplices to avoid jail time. 3⃣Another phrase is “smell a rat,” which means “to suspect an instance of wrongdoing, deception or betrayal.” Ex: The witness smelled a rat when he saw the suspect leaving the scene of the crime. 4⃣Finally, “the rat race” describes the intense competition and long hours of the urban work environment. Ex: Eric dreamed of leaving the rat race and buying a small farm.
因此 rat 也可延伸作為動詞:rat out/on,指「出賣某人」,如:The thief ratted out his accomplices to avoid jail time.(那個小偷出賣他的同夥逃避坐牢。)另一個片語則是 smell a rat,指「發覺有可疑之處」,如:The witness smelled a rat when he saw the suspect leaving the scene of the crime.(目擊者看到嫌犯離開案發現場時覺得行為可疑。)最後是 the rat race,用來形容職場競爭激烈且工時長的現象。如:Eric dreamed of leaving the rat race and buying a small farm.(艾瑞克夢想著離開這競爭激烈的工作環境,去鄉下種田。)
While the Chinese “shu” is usually translated as “rat,” it can also refer to mice. And mice have a slightly better reputation in English than rats. Mice are small, quiet and shy, so 5⃣ “quiet at a mouse” refers to someone who is shy and timid. Ex: The new student in our class is quiet as a mouse. 6⃣And if someone is “poor as a church mouse,” they’re really poor. This is because churches usually don’t usually store food, so mice who lived in them would have nothing to eat. Ex: My parents were poor as a church mouse when I was born.
雖然中文字「鼠」常常翻作 rat「大老鼠」,不過也可以指 mouse(複數形 mice)「小老鼠」。在英文中,小老鼠的形象比大老鼠稍微好些。小老鼠體型較小,安靜又害羞,所以 quiet as a mouse 可以用來形容某人「害羞膽怯的」,如:The new student in our class is quiet as a mouse.(我們班新來的學生很害羞。)要是說某人 poor as a church mouse,就是說他們「非常窮」。由來是因為教堂通常不會儲藏食物,所以住在教堂裡的老鼠根本沒東西可吃。如:My parents were poor as a church mouse when I was born.(我父母在我出生時候非常窮。)
【✍重點單字】
1. rodent「嚙齒類動物」
2. Chinese Zodiac「十二生肖」:zodiac指西洋占星的十二星座。
3. diligence「勤奮」:當名詞,形容詞 diligent。
4. it’s no accident that…「沒有意外,……」
5. colloquial「口語的」:相對於書寫文字而言,較不正式的說法。
6. deceptive「愛騙人、說謊的」:當形容詞,名詞 deception。
7. informant「告密者」
8. urban「都市的」:相反詞為 rural「鄉下的」。
9. reputation「名聲」
#鼠年行大運 #鼠錢鼠不完
-
🔔 按下「搶先看」,每週五【美國大小事】,由 Judd 編審分享最即時美國新鮮事!想知道更多美國文化,請看 👉 http://bit.ly/EZTalk嚴選
in the first instance中文 在 Alexander Wang 王梓沅英文 Facebook 的最佳貼文
【王老師寫給你看】用 GRE 分析寫作練邏輯思維、學寫,留學時台灣學生別再當美國學生的後援會啦!
除了「時間不夠」之外,準備 GRE 分析寫作的台灣考生最常碰到的致命傷就是寫了半天「沒有切題、討論到該討論的東西」。而這也是不管原本英文程度如何的學生、還是學霸指數多少的學生,都會遇到的狀況。
雖說很多考生都聽過「主題句」很重要(主題句 = 扣題立場+原因) ,但「實際操作」跟「頭腦裡知道」往往有很大的差距,大概 5 個學生裡有4 個就會偏題。
除此之外,我們的母語中文表達想法時的 vagueness ,也很常讓台灣考生偏題或沒掌握好題目的 scope 。
(e.g. 題目問高等教育對職涯發展的影響,結果學生一直在討論高等教育或是教育 )。
✔︎ 假設今天我們拿到了這個高頻題:
To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
某學生在第二段寫了這樣的主題句:
First of all, the most important characteristics of a society can be defined in a variety of ways.
寫完後,我問了學生:
• 你覺得你這樣有回答到問題嗎?
• 你是如何分析這個題幹 (prompt) 的呢?
• 為什麼一開始就把 "understand" 和 "must study" 這兩個重要的概念給丟掉了了呢?
學生後來又加了一句話,變成 (原文直接呈現,無做調整)
First of all, the most important characteristic of a society can be defined in a variety of ways. Based on the reason, we may not rule out the possibility that the most attracting characteristic in one's heart is not existed in the major city.
• 加了第二句話後,我們又看到了至少4個問題:
(1) important characteristics 怎麼被過度成 attracting characteristics 了呢?(一字代換即離題)
(2) 補 in one's heart 的用意是什麼呢?
(3) 核心概念的 "of a society" 在第二句話消失了
(4) is not existed 為嚴重會導致扣分的文法錯誤(因文章有5處出現一樣的錯誤)。
啊,英文好難啊,你一定這樣想。怎麼會才寫兩句話,就那麼多問題呢?主因來自於大家忽略了好的學術寫作學習,需要系統性的訓練、和練習。很多考生都錯以為範文看一看、點子想一想就可以上場了。
➠ 依照著學生的想法,我試寫了一段:
I partially agree with the statement, as we can certainly gain a deeper understanding of some defining features of a society by studying its major cities, where we can easily observe the socio-cultural events, beliefs, and phenomena that collectively contribute to the construction of the "identity" of a society. However, it should be noted that some of these features that help define a society can ONLY be observed in small towns, as opposed to major cities. Therefore, if we wish to thoroughly--rather than partially--understand the most important characteristics of a society, we must study both big cities and small towns. For instance, ....
在我的改寫中你可以注意到,我沒有一句話會脫離「理解」的這個概念,我也盡可能的讓「社會」這個概念不離開我的寫作 (e.g. socio-cultural events, beliefs, and phenomena; some of these features that help define a society)。
政治、經濟算社會嗎?當然也算。但在時間有限的狀況下,直接寫 social-cultural 是最方便的處理方式。
另外你也可以注意到,我是部分同意了本文。我同意要理解一個社會最重要的核心特色,我們一定要研究大城市。但我在第三句話後面塞了 "thoroughly--rather than partially" 這樣的表達,去闡述如果要「夠全面的了解」只研究大城市不夠。
再回到學生最最一開始的版本:First of all, the most important characteristic of a society can be defined in a variety of ways. 你覺得好嗎?
若你接下來有準備 GRE考試的計畫,我將在 1/8 (三) 的 GRE 高分公開課中,我將基於8年的機經題庫,剖析GRE考試的最新趨勢和分享有效的備戰策略,若你/妳接下來有要備考GRE的計畫,歡迎你來參加喔!
➠ ➠【公開課報名】 ➠ ➠
https://www.accupass.com/event/1912220416341342776738
➤ 時間: 1/8 (三) 19:30 ~ 21:00 (19:00 進場)
➤ 地點: 台北市朱崙街60號2F (MRT 南京復興站)
【講師介紹】
王梓沅 (GRE V166 / 穩定 AW 5.5, PR 98、TOEFL 117、IELTS 滿分)
哥倫比亞大學應用語言學碩士
賓州大學 (UPenn) 社會語言學碩士
創勝文教共同創辦人、GRE 課程負責人
《GRE 學霸字彙》作者 (2019 眾文圖書出版)
in the first instance中文 在 Eric's English Lounge Youtube 的最佳貼文
期待的政治英文影片第二集出爐了!!! 今天探討的是三位政治大咖的英文口語。再次聲明,此影片的目的不在於比較英文能力,而是提供學習者英文口語的實際操作和可以注意的小細節。對我而言,英文是一種工具,我並不覺得台灣的政治人物一定需要擁有驚人的外語能力。以下是影片中提到的一些資訊,請看完再發表評論:
關於韓市長的「晶晶體」: http://bit.ly/2kENRVv
★★★★★★★★★★★★
英文口語評估指標
• 是否到達溝通目的
• 考量語境/當下場景
• 詞彙資源
• 文法範圍和正確度
• 連貫性和流暢度還有發音
★★★★★★★★★★★★
韓國瑜(1957年6月17日-),中華民國政治人物,中國國民黨,現任高雄市市長,中華民國陸軍軍官學校專修學生班40期、東吳大學英國語文學系文學學士、國立政治大學東亞研究所法學碩士。
EDIT: New Sample (08.21.2019): https://youtu.be/1xrcXcZvAko?t=148 (請先看完我們的分析)
最先去搜尋的是ICRT全英文的專訪,但是大部分影片和錄音檔都被刪除,只留下一些片段: https://youtu.be/zDYhd7XiSUQ?t=12 (Vid 1)
•prosperious -- prosperous Kaohsiung
•We will hire the English teacher so that we can save money -- cause, effect relationship?
•intelligible English pronunciation but spoke in short phrases
https://youtu.be/3helP_n9jY8?t=481 (Vid 2)
•唸稿子的時候有適當的停頓, 英文語調也有上下的起伏
•met--made, we have made the impossible possible
•in everyone eyes--in everyone’s eyes
•longing for better tomorrow --longing for a better tomorrow
•整體上來說沒有什麼問題...
•很難去評估真正的英文口語能力,畢竟是念稿子
•從詞彙量而言,至少足夠回應一般生活類問題
•因為句子還蠻短的,所以沒有什麼語法錯誤
•口音是一定有的,但是算標準,可以聽得懂
•短句的流暢度沒有大問題,但是連貫性可以增加
★★★★★★★★★★★★
郭台銘(英文名:Terry Gou,1950年10月18日-),中華民國企業家,新北板橋人,籍貫山西省晉城縣,臺灣省立板橋中學初中部、中國海事專科學校(今臺北海洋科技大學)航運管理科畢業,是鴻海科技集團(富士康)和鴻海精密的董事長兼總經理。以個人資產705億美元名列富比士億萬富翁列表中的第7大富豪,同時也是臺灣首富。2019年4月17日,郭台銘宣布投入中國國民黨的2020年中華民國總統選舉黨內初選。
郭台銘 - 企業領袖高峰會演講 APEC CEO Summit 2013: https://youtu.be/c733wqJup_I?t=175
•聽完他的對答覺得講得很好
•應該已經在商業界上運用英文三十幾年了
•1985就建立在美國一家分公司
•因為是商業場合,講的話算官方但直接
•以流暢度來說,會給高的評分
•英文詞彙上應用專業術語 (e.g., key components, technology integration)
•不熟悉字型的變化 morphology/word form--manufacture, manufacturing, manufacturer --we emerged as an electronics manufacturer; we innovation designer --no be verb; we are use all component and integration --we utilize component integration testing?, etc.)
•發音也蠻多問題的
•猜測他應該是有在練英文口語
•應該沒有太多寫作上的需求
•猜測他學習英文的方式是蠻自然的
•沒有花額外的時間在學習文法,刻意的去修正自己的錯誤
•學習英文的只是為了工作需求
•說話有連貫性也有技巧,但是無法精準表達意思
•在特定場景的口說上應該是沒有問題,因為重複性高而且大概可以猜出他會講什麼
•說實話,表現超出預料
★★★★★★★★★★★★
柯文哲(1959年8月6日-),中華民國著名外科醫師、無黨籍政治人物。現任臺北市市長。國立臺灣大學醫學院臨床醫學研究所博士畢業,曾任臺大醫院急診部醫師、臺大醫院創傷醫學部主任、臺大醫學院教授,2014年宣布參選臺北市市長選舉,並以「在野大聯盟」為號召,同年當選臺北市第15任直轄市市長,成為臺北市改制直轄市後首位無黨籍市長。2018年,參選臺北市市長並成功連任。
https://youtu.be/ffIxQ27jUdQ?t=159
•首先媒體對柯市長太嚴格了
•常講英文的時候是為了開玩笑「柯式幽默」
•在這個影片當中他確實有看稿子
•and da today
•today (stress on the second syllable )
•medical (stress on first syllable)
•metary -- military
• problems cause by L1 interference
•從語音結構上來看,中文是一種「音節計時語言(syllable-timed language)及「聲調語言」(tone language),每個字由一個音節構成,唸起來各音節輕重相當且時間大致等長,而且每個字有自己的聲調;但英語是一種「重音計時語言」(stress-timed language)及「語調語言」(intonation language),每個字的音節數不一,由各音節是否有重音來決定其輕重、長短與音階高低,而重音落於何處也會決定其語意之不同。
-campus.cavesbooks.com.tw
•One of the most noticeable features of English is that some of its syllables are strong while many others are weak” (Roach, 2000, p81). English stress pattern is manifested through syllable length, loudness and pitch. In other words, stressed syllables are longer, louder and higher pitched than unstressed ones. Sometimes one word that is stressed differently may have different grammatical functions and meanings, for example, the homographs “record” (verb) and “record” (noun). “Record” has the stress on second syllable when it is a verb, and it has stress on the first when it is a noun. The shift of the stress even makes a noticeable difference to the sound of the vowels, for instance, “e” in noun “REcord” is pronounced as /e/, but /ɪ/ in verb “reCORD”.
-http://ec-concord.ied.edu.hk
•coal values -- core values
•freedom, tolerance, rule of law
•用詞大致上是正確的雖然還是有字形上(word form)的問題
•expensive -- expense
•每個句子都很短,但還是有溝通的功能
•蠻多文法的問題
•個人認為是有知識和魅力的一位候選人
•聽他用英文演講一段時間真的有困擾,因為沒重音,很難辨識重點
•講話沒有太多語調和節奏,在英文發音裡面是一個非常重要的環節
•會導致聽者需要完全專注他每一個字才能辨識他在說什麼
•不覺得每一個政治人物都需要英文,有專業和可靠的翻譯輔助,就覺得不會是一種困擾
•英文是一種工具,多一種工具就多一種選擇,但這種工具用不好時也有可能會造成一些誤解
★★★★★★★★★★★★
在此提供我的「心智圖詞彙攻略」課程: https://bit.ly/2teELDq
英文學習專頁: https://www.facebook.com/ericsenglishlounge/
還有Howard老師《會走路的翻譯機,神級英文學習攻略本》的傳送門 http://bit.ly/2DfGrhH
★★★★★★★★★★★★
同時也再次感謝炙瞳夢 RED FILM幾位大導演和貓哥的友情協助,幫我們拍攝和剪接出如此精彩的影片!
★★★★★★★★★★★★
